No Evolution
| “We would expect every word of the Quran to be literally true. In that case, the creation story would be accepted as literally true. The story of Adam and Eve would be accepted as literally true.” Source: Richard Dawkins Video |
Let’s understand the situation of the evolution view against reality with an example:
| SCIENTIFIC FINDING |
A fossil pelican beak that is exactly the same as the one we have today, 30 million years old. Source: 1 |
| REAL |
A 30-million-year-old pelican beak identical to the one found today. |
“CHOOSE THE TRUTH, NOT A LOGICAL FAKE”
| LIE |
This is how the sun god created the pelican’s beak. |
| LIE |
This is how aliens created the pelican beak. |
| LIE |
The evolutionary process brought the pelican’s beak to this state 20 million years ago. |
| LIE |
The reason for the “x” is that the pelican’s beak did this. |
| LIE |
We don’t know why the pelican’s beak is like that. |
| REAL |
A 30-million-year-old pelican beak identical to the one found today. |
We do not add fake comments that fit our logic. Only the truth. 🤐
Yes, we just focus on the truth…
| REAL |
A 30 million-year-old pelican beak identical to today’s was found. |
| QURAN |
30:30 There is no change in Allah’s creation. |
| QURAN |
59:24 He is Allah, the Creator, the Perfecter , the Giver of Form. |
| QURAN |
59:24 He is Allah, the Creator, the Perfecter, the Giver of Form. |
| QURAN |
32:7 He creates everything that is good . |
| QURAN |
67:3 You will not find any contradiction or difference (tafavut) in Allah’s creation . |
You see that the verses of the Quran cannot be denied; they are simply facts .
Those who oppose these verses and scientific findings and say, “No, not everything was created in its perfect form,” are mired in insincerity.
Only Truth = Quran
| REAL |
Even the smallest living cell cannot be produced in a laboratory environment. |
| QURAN |
16:20 Those whom they call gods besides Allah cannot create anything. |
No room for guesswork!
Just facts…
Teaching of the Verses of the Miracle of Creation
| QURAN |
26:32 When he threw down his staff, it became a manifest serpent. |
| MUSA |
The stick immediately turned into a snake. It was proven that living things could be created instantly. |
| PHARAOH |
Life began in the muddy waters of the Nile and evolved. ( EA Wallis Budge, Ancient Egyptian Literature ) (1) |
“At that time there was nothing but the vast body of water called Nu, but this water contained the seeds of all that was to come into being.” (EA Wallis Budge, Ancient Egyptian Literature)(1)
The insincere people make their choice…
| QURAN |
10:83 No one from the people believed in Moses except a group of young men. |
| QURAN |
43:47 When Moses brought them the proofs of the truth, they laughed. |
This example teaches:
Those who denied the clear truths that came in the past and those who deny the Quran, which does not contain anything but the truth, are of the same insincere nature.
The Quran consists of “simple, clear” real information.
| QURAN |
“Everything is recorded.” 34:3, 27:75, 22:70, 10:61, 54:53, 57:22 |
| QURAN |
67:3 You will not find any contradiction or difference (tafavut) in Allah’s creation . |
| SCIENTIFIC FINDING |
72 wolf DNA remains spanning 100 thousand years were found. It was found to be identical to today’s wolf DNA. Source: 1 |
| REAL |
DNA from 72 wolves, 100 thousand years old, was found. The DNA found is the same as today’s wolf DNA. |
| LIE |
The fact that the DNA of 72 wolves remained the same for 100 thousand years has proven natural selection . We have found evidence of natural selection, which is the basis of evolution in ancient times. Source: 1 |
Now, for which verse of the Quran should we say, “NO! LIE!” ?
For which argument of evolution should we say “YES! TRUE!” ?
The Quran and Evolution Contradict
1. SCAM
| SCIENTIFIC FINDING |
The discovery that approximately 70% of living things are made up of water was made by French chemist and biologist Antoine Lavoisier at the end of the century and the beginning of the 19th century. It is also mentioned that in 1936, Japanese scientists discovered that 78% of humans are water. |
| QURAN |
24:45 Allah created all living things from water. |
| REAL |
Living things consist of 70%-80% water. |
| LIE |
In the Quran, the water that forms living things is the muddy water that evolution began in. It has been proven that the Quran does not contradict evolution. |
2. SCAM
For example, in the verse “Created from water” the WATER = SEMEN (Sperm) .
86:5 Let man look, from what was he created?
86:6 He was created from a jet of water (ماء).
86:7 He comes out from between the backbone and the ribs. (Science has just discovered this scientific fact.)
77:20 Did We not create you from a vile water?
77:21 Then We placed it in a firm place,
77:22 for a specified term .
77:23 Then We formed it. How excellent is Our moulder!
77:24 Woe to those who deny it on that day.
| LIE |
In the Quran, it is said that humans were created from water. This water is the muddy water in which the evolutionary process began. As you can see, the Quran does not contradict evolution. |
They cannot form a single cell in the environment they describe.
Even if they recreated the environment in which the first living cell formed, they couldn’t create a living organism today. (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)
Evolutionary philosophies with wealth have offered huge rewards for the creation of living cells. (1)
The 1400-year-old Quran states that no one other than God can create anything.(1)
The lie that evolution is a complex subject.
Evolution today is to us what stone idols were to Abraham’s time.
They said to Abraham, “All the leading scholars of Babylon believe in stone idols. Should we believe you or the scholars?”
In this era, they say, “All scientists accept evolution. Evolution is not a simple matter. It’s not simply a case of ape turning into man.”
The craftsmanship of a stone idol is unimportant. The fact that a stone idol has a lot of craftsmanship doesn’t make it more important. Ultimately, it’s not the truth.
In other words, there’s no difference between saying, “O Abraham, you cannot call our idols mere pieces of stone. Don’t you see the craftsmanship, the carvings, the details, the artistry in them…” and saying, “Many books, articles, and research papers have been written about evolution. Tell me, is evolution simple?”
This is what the deniers are actually trying to do. If the Day of Judgment comes, they will say, “Our God, if we accepted something so complex, something that requires so much knowledge to deny, what is our fault?” They are trying to fabricate something to say.
In other words, the statement, “Evolution is a very complex subject requiring a great deal of knowledge. Understanding it requires advanced biology and cytology education,” is a lie.
Those who say this think they will be able to say on the Day of Judgment, “Our God, you brought before us a Westerner who requires such advanced education. Now, if we deny it, what is our fault?”
The fly has changed, but the wolf hasn’t, imagine that!
Amber fossils and fossils have proven that plants and insects have been the same since the first creation.
But evolutionists said, “The veins in the wings of flies look different; they are all intermediate species.”
However, DNA remnants found proved that not only flies, but even humans, wolves, and dogs have not changed.
All human DNA remnants found were proven to be the same as modern human DNA.
It was proven that since the first creation, humans have always been humans, wolves have always been wolves, and dogs have always been dogs. (1) (1)
They choose fabrication over the truth.
Regarding the 30-million-year change in the pelican beak, they say, “This reveals 30 million years of evolutionary stasis.”(1)
Regarding 72 wolf DNA remnants spanning 100,000 years, they say, “The fact that their genes remained stable allowed us to detect natural selection.”(1)
Here you should see that they are distorting the truth.
They can fit every piece of scientific evidence found to evolution. This is proof that these evolutionists are not sincere.
“First, look at what you yourself believe,” they say.
Moses’ staff turning into a snake is proof of God’s immediate creation.
“But we don’t believe in this,” they say.
The important point here is a method of reality.
That is, we ask evolutionists, “If Moses’ staff had turned into a snake before your eyes today, would you believe in that person’s God?”
The person who says “Yes, I would” accepts this method of reality.
The evolutionist who says, “No, why would this prove a God? We would have an explanation for that too,” then asks why such an event hasn’t happened in history.
In other words, what matters to these evolutionists is not whether this event happened or not, but what their reaction would be if this event happened today.
We see that evolutionists are not sincere people.
The parting of the sea is a phenomenon that can still be observed today. See: “Passage du Gois“
The null hypothesis is null.
The null hypothesis is important for agnosticism and evolutionary thought.
They deny God through the null hypothesis.
If an angel were to descend from heaven and say to an agnostic, “God, the Lord of the Worlds, has sent me. I will introduce Him to you. He is real,” the agnostic would say, “I am producing a null hypothesis for God. Why would the existence of such an angel be proof of God? I am not even producing a null hypothesis; there isn’t even an experimental test to run it. For now, I accept nothing beyond the existence of a giant winged angel as proven. We cannot know beyond that.”
In other words, for an agnostic, the descent of an angel from heaven or speaking with the dead means nothing.
The Quran states, “Even if We were to send down to them angels and the dead were to speak to them and We were to gather them all together in groups, they would not believe.” (1)
The null hypothesis shows how far these people can go in their insincerity.
With a null hypothesis, it can make it impossible to reach the truth even in a question like “Where are my shoes?”. It’s a method of refuting someone who says, “Your shoes are in the shoe rack,” even if the person is simply picturing the shoes, by saying, “I need proof that these are my shoes.”
Unrealistic questioning method
A tree grows from a tiny seed. A single drop of water initiates the process of pregnancy. 250 grams of uranium destroys a large city. This is God’s astonishing workings.
Now, instead of seeing this superior, wise, and astonishing working, they say, “It’s astonishing that living beings were created instantaneously, but let’s invent a creation story that fits our own logic.”
These people are blind to the truth because of their arrogance. They believe their own logic is the wisest.
However, it’s like a small child saying, “All living things are brought by storks. That’s the creation story that fits my logic.” These people are no different from a child resisting the truth.
Now, instead of understanding how utterly devoid of reason they are in their arrogance, they say, “There can be no more logical method of creation than evolution.”
They resort to an unrealistic questioning method, asking, “Couldn’t God create through evolution if He wanted to?”
They try to obscure the truth by drawing strength from the unrealistic questioning method of agnosticism. They think they can invalidate the truth with unrealistic questions like, “Couldn’t God create through evolution?”, “Couldn’t God create a god stronger than himself?”
The common feature of these questions is that they are unrealistic. For example, they are based on the same logic as, “Couldn’t aliens have green eyes?”
There is no difference in terms of logical fabrication between the questions, “Couldn’t God have three siblings?”, “Couldn’t God have a mother?”, and the question, “If everything was created, couldn’t God have been created by someone else?” The truth is not like that.
Those who saw Moses’ staff denied the clear truth by saying, “Show us God.”(1)
That is, even if a door opened from the sky and angels appeared, these people would say, “We will not believe until we see God with our own eyes.” They thought they had found a valid excuse for denying the truth by always demanding more.
In other words, the Quran clearly refutes the question, “Couldn’t God have created through evolution?”, but you should see the logic game here.
They trap Muslims by implying that God is infinitely powerful, saying, “Where is God’s power? Isn’t He capable of creating through evolution?”
The Muslim then says, “Yes, God can create through evolution, why not?” But the correct answer to this question should be, “This question is an unrealistic one.”
Therefore, one can come up with countless unrealistic questions like, “Couldn’t God create in a glass container?”, “Couldn’t God give birth to living beings?” Such questions are unrealistic. The messengers who came with the truth taught us the truth of creation.
Today, the truth of creation is in the Quran. We are only after the truth, aren’t we?
Natural selection and race wars
Darwin said, “I see that inferior races will be eliminated by superior races.”(1)
Darwin also said, “I can prove that natural selection has been, and still is, more beneficial to the progress of civilization than you imagine.”(1)
Natural selection means “The strong eliminate the weak.”
When food is thrown to stray dogs, they start fighting for it. Since humans share a common ancestor with dogs, they shouldn’t behave differently.
And so it happened. Races that accepted evolution were told, “The superior race eliminates the weak race. Natural selection requires this.”
These races began to ruthlessly eliminate other races.
Natural selection is the foundation of evolution. If natural selection is not accepted, the evolutionary process is canceled. There is no longer a basis for the evolutionary view.
In evolution, women are an inferior race.
Darwin said, “Women are someone who will keep you company, someone who will keep you occupied better than a dog, someone who will take care of the house and the responsibilities of the home.”(1)
Males are considered homo frontalis, and females are considered homo parietalis.
The smaller brain size of women is often cited as evidence. Yet, it’s clear that an elephant has a much larger brain and isn’t more intelligent than a human, failing to understand that intelligence has nothing to do with brain size.
Evolutionary proponents lie by saying, “Evolutionary theory is not racist and does not claim that one species is superior to another.” Because natural selection, the foundation of evolutionary theory, states that “the strong eliminate the weak.” The natural consequence of natural selection, even if not explicitly stated, gives rise to claims of superiority. Evolution doesn’t need to explicitly say that one species is superior to another. Consider this: if the white race is pursuing the elimination of Black people in the battle of natural selection to ensure the continuation of its species, what difference does it make if it doesn’t explicitly say “Whites are superior”? This is the basis of this savagery in evolution.
Over 200 million large fossils and billions of smaller fossils have been found in the world.
Starfish (450 million years old)
Dragonfly (92 million years old)
Wild Bee (100 million years old)
Fern (290 million years old)
LIE
Evolutionists compare the fossil of an organism to its present-day form and say, “These are different species; look, there are differences.” They even go so far as to claim that two organisms living in the same period are different species. Source: 1
Be honest and don’t accept lies in the face of truth.